Characterization of a novel antibiofilm effect of nitric oxide-releasing aspirin (NCX-4040) on Candida albicans isolates from denture stomatitis patients.

Candida albicans biofilms play a key role in denture stomatitis, one of the most common oral pathologies in elderly people. Because biofilms are highly resistant to antifungals, new pharmacological strategies are needed. Aspirin and nitric oxide-donor molecules have both shown antibiofilm effects on C. albicans, making them promising candidates for treatment. In this study, we evaluated the antifungal/antibiofilm effect of a nitric-oxide releasing aspirin (NO-ASA) on C. albicans isolates from denture stomatitis patients in vitro. Disk diffusion assays showed that while NO-ASA had no antifungal effect, the drug potentiated fluconazole inhibition zone diameters, increasing the effect of fluconazole by 20-30% (p<0.05). The effect of NO-ASA on the morphogenesis of C. albicans was evaluated using light microscopy after inducing hyphae formation. For all clinical strains assayed, 125 µM NO-ASA significantly decreased the number of filamentous cells present (p<0.01). Adhesion to abiotic surfaces, a critical event for biofilm formation, was evaluated in 96-well polystyrene plates using crystal violet assay; 125 µM NO-ASA significantly inhibited adhesion. Biofilms were observed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and quantified using XTT reduction assay. NO-ASA decreased biofilm formation (IC50 ranging from 300 µM to 700 µM), consistent with SEM findings of altered biofilm microarchitecture. PGE2 and carboxy-PTIO (an NO scavenger) both blocked the antibiofilm effects of NO-ASA, suggesting that the efficacy of NO-ASA may be associated with both inhibition of PGE2 synthesis and release of NO. NO-ASA is a promising novel antibiofilm agent for treating fluconazole-resistant strains of C. albicans.

Comparison of seven diagnostic tests to detect Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients in chronic phase of Chagas disease.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the diagnostic performance of seven methods to determine Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients with chronic Chagas disease. METHODS: Analytical study, using the case-control design, which included 205 people (patients with Chagasic cardiomyopathy, n=100; control group, n=105). Three enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, one indirect hemagglutination assay and one immunochromatographic test were assessed. Additionally, DNA amplification was performed via the PCR method using kinetoplast and nuclear DNA as target sequences. For the comparative analysis of diagnostic tests, the parameters used were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC), positive and negative likelihood ratio, as well as κ quality analysis. RESULTS: The commercial Bioelisa Chagas test showed the highest sensitivity (98%), specificity (100%), and positive and negative predictive values; ​​additionally, it had the highest discriminatory power. Otherwise, the amplification of T. cruzi DNA in blood samples showed low values of sensitivity (kinetoplast DNA = 51%, nuclear DNA = 22%), but high values of specificity (100%), and moderate to low discriminatory ability. CONCLUSION: The comparative analysis among the different methods suggests that the diagnostic strategy of T. cruzi infection in patients with chronic Chagas disease can be performed using ELISA assays based on recombinant proteins and/or synthetic peptides, which show higher diagnosis performance and can confirm and exclude the diagnosis of T. cruzi infection. The molecular methods show poor performance when used in the diagnosis of patients with chronic Chagas disease.

OBJETIVO: Comparar la capacidad diagnóstica de siete métodos para determinar infección por Trypanosoma cruzi, en pacientes con enfermedad de Chagas crónica. MÉTODOS: Estudio analítico de casos y controles, que incluyó 205 personas (pacientes con miocardiopatía chagásica, n= 100; grupo control, n= 105). Se evaluaron tres inmunoensayos enzimáticos, una hemaglutinación indirecta y una inmunocromatografia. Adicionalmente, se realizó amplificación de ADN de T. cruzi por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa utilizando como secuencias diana ADN de kinetoplasto y nuclear. Para el análisis comparativo de las pruebas diagnósticas, los parámetros utilizados fueron sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivo positivo y negativo, análisis ROC, razón de verosimilitud positiva y negativa, así como análisis de calidad κ. RESULTADOS: La prueba de Chagas Bioelisa mostró la mayor sensibilidad (98%), especificidad (100%) y valores predictivos positivo y negativo; además tuvo el mayor poder discriminatorio. En contraste, los ensayos de amplificación de ADN de T. cruzi mostraron baja sensibilidad (ADN de kinetoplasto = 51%, ADN nuclear = 22%), alta especificidad (100%) y de moderada a baja capacidad discriminatoria. CONCLUSIÓN: El análisis comparativo entre los métodos sugiere utilizar como estrategia diagnóstica en pacientes crónicos con enfermedad de Chagas, los ensayos de ELISA con proteínas recombinantes y/o péptidos sintéticos por mostrar un rendimiento diagnóstico superior y tener la capacidad de confirmar y descartar el diagnóstico de infección por T. cruzi. Los métodos moleculares muestran pobre rendimiento para ser utilizados en el diagnóstico de pacientes en fase crónica con enfermedad de Chagas.

Comparison of seven diagnostic tests to detect Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients in chronic phase of Chagas disease / Comparación de siete pruebas diagnósticas para detectar infección por Trypanosoma cruzi en pacientes en fase crónica de la enfermedad de Chagas

Objective: To compare the diagnostic performance of seven methods to determine Trypanosoma cruzi infection in patients with chronic Chagas disease. Methods: Analytical study, using the case-control design, which included 205 people (patients with Chagasic cardiomyopathy, n= 100; control group, n= 105). Three enzyme linked immunosorbent assays, one indirect hemagglutination assay and one immunochromatographic test were assessed. Additionally, DNA amplification was performed via the PCR method using kinetoplast and nuclear DNA as target sequences. For the comparative analysis of diagnostic tests, the parameters used were sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, Receiver Operator Characteristic (ROC), positive and negative likelihood ratio, as well as κ quality analysis. Results: The commercial Bioelisa Chagas test showed the highest sensitivity (98%), specificity (100%), and positive and negative predictive values; additionally it had the highest discriminatory power. Otherwise, the amplification of T. cruzi DNA in blood samples showed low values of sensitivity (kinetoplast DNA= 51%, nuclear DNA= 22%), but high values of specificity (100%), and moderate to low discriminatory ability. Conclusion: The comparative analysis among the different methods suggests that the diagnostic strategy of T. cruzi infection in patients with chronic Chagas disease can be performed using ELISA assays based on recombinant proteins and/or synthetic peptides, which show higher diagnosis performance and can confirm and exclude the diagnosis of T. cruzi infection. The molecular methods show poor performance when used in the diagnosis of patients with chronic Chagas disease.

Objetivo: Comparar la capacidad diagnóstica de siete métodos para determinar infección por Trypanosoma cruzi, en pacientes con enfermedad de Chagas crónica. Métodos: Estudio analítico de casos y controles, que incluyó 205 personas (pacientes con miocardiopatía chagásica, n= 100; grupo control, n= 105). Se evaluaron tres inmunoensayos enzimáticos, una hemaglutinación indirecta y una inmunocromatografia. Adicionalmente, se realizó amplificación de ADN de T. cruzi por reacción en cadena de la polimerasa utilizando como secuencias diana ADN de kinetoplasto y nuclear. Para el análisis comparativo de las pruebas diagnósticas, los parámetros utilizados fueron sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivo positivo y negativo, análisis ROC, razón de verosimilitud positiva y negativa, así como análisis de calidad κ. Resultados: La prueba Bioelisa para Chagas mostró la mayor sensibilidad (98%), especificidad (100%) y valores predictivos positivo y negativo; además ésta tuvo el mayor poder discriminatorio. En contraste, los ensayos de amplificación de ADN de T. cruzi mostraron baja sensibilidad (ADN de kinetoplasto= 51%, ADN nuclear= 22%), alta especificidad (100%) y de moderada a baja capacidad discriminatoria. Conclusión: El análisis comparativo entre los métodos sugiere utilizar como estrategia diagnóstica en pacientes crónicos con enfermedad de Chagas, los ensayos de ELISA con proteínas recombinantes y/o péptidos sintéticos por mostrar un rendimiento diagnóstico superior y tener la capacidad de confirmar y descartar el diagnóstico de infección por T. cruzi. Los métodos moleculares muestran pobre rendimiento para ser utilizados en el diagnóstico de pacientes en fase crónica con enfermedad de Chagas.